Successful water-metering programmes rely as much on strong contractor relationships as they do on technical design. Contract management isn’t about policing a supplier[JF1] ; it’s about creating the conditions where the contractor and the provider are both pushing toward the same outcome: every property metered safely, fairly, and consistently, and every contractor paid fairly for efficient, high-quality work.
From day one, the contractor needs to be fully aligned with the programme’s purpose — accurate, equitable metering across the entire customer base. That means:
applying installation standards consistently across all property types
following clear rules on private-side responsibilities
adhering to the escalation pathway for hard-to-find connections
treating customers professionally and respectfully on site
A consistent approach avoids variability between locales, reduces complaints, and builds public trust in the programme’s fairness.
A metering project thrives when the commercial model rewards the right behaviour. Contractors should be paid in a way that reflects:
productivity for standard installations – fixed rate
fair compensation for non-standard or complex sites – Schedule of alterations and day rates to base complex work on.
clear rates for escalation stages (GPR, isolation testing, machine dig, etc.) – schedule of rates against a contingency
no incentive to rush difficult sites or over-work simple ones[JF2] – escalation process for schedule or day rates to work through challenging sites
Transparency removes friction. The contractor knows what they’re paid for, the provider knows what they are paying for, and both sides avoid time-wasting debates about variations.
Contract management should give the contractor certainty about:
when to escalate an investigation
what evidence to provide before moving to the next step
what constitutes “reasonable effort” before a site is paused
how customer disputes or access issues are handled
how reinstatement and defects are managed
what “done” actually means
This removes ambiguity and stops the rollout from being driven by personalities, interpretations, or ad-hoc site decisions.
Contractors respond well to clear expectations, timely decisions, and respectful communication. A strong relationship includes:
regular site walk-throughs and toolbox sessions
early discussion of emerging risks or patterns
rapid approvals for escalation or variations
shared KPIs that reflect both quality and throughput
celebrating milestones, not just chasing defects
A contractor who feels respected, heard, and fairly paid will deliver better outcomes — and will solve problems before they land in your inbox.
When contract management is structured around fairness — for customers and for contractors — the rollout becomes predictable, disputes fall away, and productivity climbs. The work gets done on time, the contractor stays motivated, and the community sees a consistent, professional installation experience.